Alright folks! The polls have been tallied! The results are in! We have a date, time, and location for our tweetup! Hurray!!
Date with 50% of the votes: August 17th at 7pm
Location with 40% of the votes: Boston Beer Works at the Fenway (61 Brookline Ave, phone number 617-536-2337)
The good news is that the winning date there is no Red Sox game at all. We’re talking they aren’t even playing an away game. This should significantly free up Boston Beer Works.
Please please please RSVP either here in comments or by DMing me on Twitter. This way if it’s a sizable group coming, I can give the folks at Boston Beer Works a heads-up. Plus we’ll know if everyone has arrived or not on the night of the tweetup. Also feel free to @, DM, or comment suggestions/queries/concerns. Looking forward to meeting folks in person!
Upon garnering suggestions from both here and Twitter, I have assembled the following polls. I’m eliminating the “other” option, because Poll-daddy didn’t do a very good job of keeping track of those on my end last time. Everybody seems to like the idea of a relaxed pub/restaurant venue and a 7pm time-slot, so all dates are accompanied by a 7pm time. All pubs/restaurants are accompanied by a general Boston location indicator for those who might not know. Poll will close at 4:00pm tomorrow, aka Thursday.
Note: It’s “Porter Belly’s Pub,” but for some reason Poll-daddy doesn’t think “porter” is a real word……
I was quite excited to be the recipient of my first ARC (Advanced Reading Copy). I hadn’t realized when I put myself on the list that The Carousel Painter was published by Bethany House, a Christian publishing group. I actually read a lot of Bethany House books when I was growing up, so I am quite familiar with the genre, but since deconverting from Christianity at 20, let’s just say, Christian fiction isn’t my first reading choice. However, I’d made a promise to the publisher, so I decided to give it a fair shot. Not to mention, this would be a great exercise in being a fair critic.
After her father dies, leaving her without family, Carrington Brouwer moves from France to Ohio to stay with her friend Augusta Galloway while looking for work in the late 1800s. Augusta’s father owns a carousel factory, and Carrie sees an opportunity to put her painting skills to good use. At the pressure of the women of the family, Mr. Galloway hires her, even though she will be the only woman working in the factory. Carrie must deal with the prejudices and fears of the men and their wives, as well as of the community, while addressing her own problems with pride and God. She also must deal with Augusta’s suitor, Tyson, who makes inappropriate moves on her and attempts to pin the theft of Mrs. Galloway’s jewels on her.
Miller possesses writing talent on the sentence level, for sure. The sentences flow well, and the dialogue is relatively believable. She shows forward-thinking for her genre by giving Carrie an independent spirit and not condemning it. At first I was excited that she seemed to be offering a relatively unique storyline to her genre.
However, the addition about half-way through of the plot-line of Carrie being a suspect in the theft of Mrs. Galloway’s jewels is a widely used one. The good Christian must suffer and have faith her innocence will be proven in the end. It was incredibly predictable. Plus it simply felt out of place and jarring given the beginning of the story.
I was also bothered by Carrie’s quirk of giggling when she’s nervous or upset. It’s such a misogynistic stereotype–the giggling female, and it simply did not fit with the rest of Carrie’s character.
I did appreciate, and I think fans of the genre will too, that Carrie’s faith and God were not the focus of nearly every single the page. Carrie growing in faith is part of her life and is addressed as such, but it is not the focus of the story. It’s simply a fact about her that comes up periodically. I know when I was into Christian lit as a teen, I would often wish they’d just tell me the story for once instead of preaching all the time. Yet I also know that fans of Christian lit will expect at least a little bit about God in the story. I think Miller struck this balance well.
Overall, it’s a step in the right direction for the genre, but Miller could have done a much better job writing a believable, unpredictable storyline while pushing the envelope against misogyny.
2.5 out of 5 stars
Source: ARC from publisher via LibraryThing‘s Early Reviewers program.
Hi fellow Massachusetts twitter librarians! The results from the first polls are in! *drum-roll*
Winning by a strong margin with 12 votes: Boston!
Runners-up: 4 votes–Worcester, 2 votes–Northampton, 1 vote–Haverhill
Winning by a very narrow margin with 5 votes: August 16-29 Weekday!
Runners-up: 4 votes–September 13-30 Weekday, 4 votes–September 16-29 Weekend
I think deciding on a tweetup location would be of great help in choosing an exact date. Suggestions so far have included a bar, a coffeeshop, NELINET’s site, somewhere at Simmons GSLIS, etc… Please comment on this post with suggestions, either general type or venue or someplace specific. If there’s an obvious concensus among the comments, then we won’t run another poll, but if there isn’t, we will. Suggestions always welcome!
I volunteered to provide a poll for both location and date of a Massachusetts librarian tweet-up. Please only vote once! I’ve done my best to pick relatively large-ish cities, but feel free to select “other” and write-in something if I’m missing something. As far as date goes, I’m asking for generalized time-frames with an exact date to be determined later. Be looking for a follow-up post with results!
Last week, a patron walked through our library door and excitedly exclaimed to us, “I haven’t been here in forever! I’ve been living electronically.” He went on to explain to us that he’s been conducting most of his research in his office via our library website.
In my graduate classes, we often talk about the library as place. By this the professors mean establishing the library building as a place the community thinks about. “Let’s go to the library” should be as natural a thought for a group of friends as “Let’s go to Starbucks.” Yet a library doesn’t only possess a physical space, they also possess a virtual space patrons frequent. Often far less, if any, thought is given to branding the library’s virtual space.
Most libraries have some sort of home page in addition to the online catalog (OPAC). Many also have a few pages directed toward certain patrons, such as a teen page in public libraries or research help for the humanities for academic libraries. The more cutting-edge libraries might also have a blog and a link to a twitter account. In my exxperience, there is no cohesiveness among these pages. There is no clear brand that this is Noname Library’s virtual space beyond perhaps a bar across the top of the page with the library’s name on it. Although I know a lot of effort is usually put into designing these pages, they often seem haphazardly thrown together. There is no cohesiveness. Worse, especially for a public used to the cutting-edge of technology, many libraries are using old, out-dated, and even proven inadequate website design theories. It’s like the designer has paid zero atttention to the research conducted in the last decade showing what works best for making a website browsable.
Thus, while Noname Library may have the most up-to-date chairs and the best seating arrangements at the actual library, their website screams the 90s, and most likely turns off at least a few users from coming back.
Libraries should think about themselves the way social networking businesses do when it comes to their presence online. There should be a symbol that automatically makes the user think of the brand, like Twitter’s bird. Although pages may look different from each other, they still should be recognizable as belonging to the same website. There should be space on the library’s website for patrons to socialize with each other, even if it was something as simple as a blog members of the book club were given guest accounts for so they could blog about the current read. Finally, and probably most importantly, the library website should consistently be assessed for browsability. Outdated web design ideas should be cleared out from the website, leaving clear, modern space.
While the library as physical place is important, the fact of the matter is, most of our patrons do not solely live their lives in the physical space. They also have virtual lives, and libraries should be a go-to place in that area of patron’s lives too.
The Unlikely Disciple: A Sinner’s Semester at America’s Holiest University chronicles Kevin Roose’s “take it to the streets” approach to the conservative/liberal culture divide in America. At the time a student at Brown, Roose decided to spend his semester abroad at infamous Liberty University, one of the best-known Christian fundamentalist colleges in the United States. He wanted an insider’s view, so for that semester he presented himself as a recent Sinner’s Prayer convert, and sought to blend in with Liberty students, doing what they would do.
You would expect a book like this to come from an Anthropology major, but Roose is actually a Journalism major, and it quite honestly shows. Roose seeks to honestly present his experiences, peppered with periodic facts about the Bible, Christianity, and the history of Liberty. While I didn’t need these explanations, I’m sure many readers would, so they are useful. However, Roose repeatedly fails to truly analyze in any sort of a detached manner the fundamentalist community. This causes the book to fall short of being academic and reading much more like a short memoir.
While Roose’s writing is surprisingly quite good, his experiment has a few fundamental flaws. I get it that Roose had to seek to blend in in order to get an insider’s view of the fundamentalist community. However, he repeatedly fails to encounter the very real experience of not fitting in among fundamentalists. Kids who are raised in the community didn’t choose to embrace this way of living the way Roose did. They are born into it; it’s drilled into their heads their whole lifetime; and they often must face the very real possibility that if they leave it they lose their families. Roose wasn’t raised believing in hell as a a real place. He never spent nights up worrying and crying over good family members who just aren’t “saved.” It truly frustrated me when I saw three possibilities in the book for him to have investigated what it’s like for people raised in the faith.
First, he goes to a meeting of a support group for men struggling with homosexual tendencies, but he went once and he didn’t then seek out anybody from this group to talk to him about what it’s like to be gay and a fundamentalist. What was he thinking? This was the perfect opportunity!
Second, Roose dates a girl, Anna, who states to him that she’s a more liberal Christian than Liberty would want. He never extensively talks with her what it’s like for women in fundamentalism. In fact, he never really seeks out the women at Liberty much at all. He goes on a few dates to help maintain his facade, but he doesn’t seem to have truly sought to befriend the women at all.
Third, he overhears some of his friends discussing how much it pains them to think of good unsaved people going to hell and worse saved people going to heaven. This is a classic issue for people raised in fundamentalist Christianity, and Roose simply comments on it in about one paragraph. You would think he would have sought to address the very real psychological pain contained in that conversation he overheard, yet he didn’t.
What bothered me most about Roose’s experience is he comes away saying that fundamentalist Christianity isn’t all that bad. The people in it are by-and-large nice folk, and we shouldn’t let a little political disagreement interfere with more cross-cultural understanding. Well, that’s easy enough for a straight, white male to say. Of course he found it mostly tolerable! His two greatest struggles were no sex for a semester and trying not to swear. He isn’t a person who believes hell is a real place struggling to combat his homosexuality. He isn’t a woman being repeatedly told she must submit to her husband and that it is unbiblical for her to teach men. I know that Roose can’t help it that he isn’t any of those people, yet he could have sought to tell their stories too. The fundamentalist kids at Liberty were nice to him because they thought he belonged, and after that because they knew about the book and wanted to look good.
In the end, The Unlikely Disciple grants the reader a view of what it’s like to be fundamentalist if you fit right in and believe it. It fails to bring up the very real dangers for people raised in the faith who don’t just naturally fit right in.
I’m concerned that it will make fundamentalist Christianity look far too safe to those who don’t encounter it much in their day to day life. Although the writing is good, this concern leads me to give it:
3 out of 5 stars
A topic keeps popping up in my classes and online that I find intensely irritating and slightly worrisome: the supposed imminent death of the printed word.
The general consensus seems to be that with continually new and improved electronic readers, such as Kindles and iPhones, eventually nobody will be willing to buy or even want to buy printed books anymore. Thus within a couple of generations they will die out.
Now, maybe it’s already possible for me, a 20-something, to be an old-fogey, but every fiber of my being simply says this will not ever completely happen.
Whether the cutting edge culture likes it or not, reading books online is simply not the same as reading them in print.
First there is the issue of reading electronic screens vs. reading paper. I work on computers all day. I had to get a special film on my glasses to keep me from getting headaches from reading screens all day. When I read for fun, I certainly don’t choose to do so online for any length of time. Yes, I may read a few news articles, as they are short, but extensive reading simply hurts my eyes if it’s done while looking at a screen. “But, Wolfy!” I can just hear you saying, “They’ll fix that with technology over time!” I seriously doubt that, but ok, let’s suppose that they do. There are still other arguments against everyone reading electronically all the time.
There is the issue of format. Either you have pdf type pages that you “flip” but still either have to scroll down on or have a device large enough to simulate the size of a regular page. This is certainly more awkward than just holding a book and flipping the pages. Not to mention, there is a lack of the automatic sensation of how much you have read. We all, I’m sure, have had the experience of reading an article online and scrolling down for, who knows how long. We then print it to realize we’ve read 15 pages. Whoa! What about how far into a book you are? If you’re reading a print book it’s obvious. If there’s a lot more in your left hand than in your right, then you’re almost done with the book. This is a physical, tangible sensation that I honestly find to be one of the joys of reading. Sure a Kindle can tell me I’m on page 1,000 of 1,234, but this simply feels hypothetical to me in a world that is already often too virtual.
Then there is the issue I’ve often seen described as “how can I read my Kindle at the beach?” A simple sentence that points out several of the flaws of electronic readers. If you get sand into a piece of technology, it’s probably ruined for good. If you get sand in a print book, you just shake it out. You must keep your Kindle charged. You could very well be in the middle of the climax only to have it power down. A printed book is always ready for you when you’re ready to read it. Then there’s the obvious similar issue of getting it wet. If a Kindle gets wet, it’s probably ruined. If a book gets wet, it could be ruined, yes, but if it’s only slightly wet, it’s no worse for the wear. I’ve even saved books that got totally drenched by blow-drying them then weighting them down for a couple of days. A book is simply more practical for reading everywhere.
Finally there’s the issue of sharing, an element I find highly important in maintaining an educated democratic populace. How do you lend a friend your copy of the electronic version of a book you fell in love with? Currently, you can’t unless you lend them your Kindle that holds all your other books too. Publishers/Amazon think they own every single digital copy of a book. It’s really them that own it, not you. Just look at the RIAA issues with music to see the history of this little situation. A printed book is truly *yours*. If you want to loan it to a friend, you can and there’s no big evil corporation/organization just waiting to sue your pants off. Nobody knows you loaned it. It’s a purely private exchange that enhance your life, your friend’s life, and the friendship. It may even enhance things for the author if the friend then falls in love with the author/book and goes to buy more to read herself.
I don’t know why people seem to be ignoring all of these facts. I hypothesize that they want to look modern, forward-thinking, etc… There’s a perpetual American fear of growing old and holding onto anything that’s been around a long time is often seen as old fogey thinking. Well, sometimes things stick around for a long time because they are the best way. Sure, there are situations when having an electronic copy of a book would be useful, say to access a textbook for class from the laptop you bring in every session anyway. But the future-looking extremists aren’t saying that electronic books will exist side-by-side with print books. They’re saying they will replace them. I really do not see that happening, and frankly, I hope for the good of the American public that it doesn’t.
I’m going to start to attempt to feature a review of a book, videogame, or movie once a month. Be warned there may be spoilers. Here’s the first!
A dystopian novel set in a future on the North American continent where the USA used to be. Land mass is significantly less due to global warming, and a new nation has been in place for quite some time called Panem. It consists of 12 districts and the capitol. Once a year each district must send one adolescent boy and one adolescent girl, chosen by a lottery, to the capitol to participate in The Hunger Games. The Hunger Games is a reality show that takes place in an environmental dome, each year the environment is different. The adolescents must fight until only one remains alive. The book focuses on a girl, Katniss, who ends up being the girl token from District 12.
I absolutely loved this book. I read it in one day, as I could not put it down. While I love reading, this type of all-engrossing engagement with a book has not happened for me in a long time.
First of all, I love the fact that the hero of the novel is female. Far too much literature out there features a male main character, and most of the books featuring female main characters are those gushy girly-girl books. They may be a fun quick read, but they don’t have any meat. This isn’t true of The Hunger Games. Katniss needs to be smart and strong in her struggle to stay alive, not only during The Games, but before even entering them. She is the sole provider for her mother and sister. Here is a strong female character, but simultaneously Collins does not make an issue of the fact that she is female. Since it is a first-person narrative, you don’t even realize her gender until around three pages in. Some reviewers *cough* male ones *cough* have complained that Katniss is cold, unfeeling, and not feminine. These complaints wouldn’t be made if she was a male character in the exact same situation behaving the exact same way. Katniss does have feelings, just as people of both genders do, but she is in a tough situation and must make tough choices. It’s wonderful to watch her struggle to make the right ones.
I also like that Collins took something we use as entertainment, reality tv, and shows how easily it could come to be distorted and used as a horrifying tool against the people. Dystopian literature is strongest when it takes something from the present and shows a plausible way it could go horribly awry.
Finally, Collins’ writing is beautiful. The conversations flow easily, the action sequences are vividly depicted, and secondary characters are quickly fleshed-out as complete people.
My only complaint is a major spoiler, as it has to do with the end of the book, so I will just let it be known that I am on Team Peeta and this is one decision of Katniss’s that makes very little sense to me.
5 out of 5 stars