Archive
The Threat of Pandemics (MLA13 Boston: Plenary 4: Laurie Garrett)
The final plenary, and indeed, the final non-CE class or tour event of MLA13 Boston, was on my list of events to blog for the official conference blog. I summed up the entire presentation. As stated previously, I can’t reproduce those posts here on my personal blog, so please go over and take a look at that summary before reading my responses to and thoughts on the presentation.
Got it? Good!
Ok, so, what was my reaction to this lecture? Well, first, honestly I had a bit of a panic. I felt frightened, unsafe, and like the world is doomed. At first I thought that was just my anxious-prone self over-reacting to the presentation, but after discussing it with friends and colleagues who were also there, I realized that Garrett seems to have actually sought to pull out this fear in people.
Why?
In a presentation that ends with pleas for us to fight fear and panic, why did she spend so much time investing in frightening us and very little (if any) spent in reassuring us? Why focus so much on pandemics just a single mistake away, germ warfare close at hand (although, not really since 3D printing of germs isn’t happening yet). I don’t know. I don’t know what would make Garrett think making people feel this way is a good thing. Maybe she’s fallen prey to the idea that the only way to get people to pay attention to your cause is to frighten them. I know people in various movements who use that tactic. It’s not one I’m a fan of. Maybe she didn’t intend to gloom and doom the people present. But I think she did. Given that her own speech pointed out the dangers of panic and unwarranted fear, I find it odd that this was her intent. And yet there you have it. A room full of frightened librarians. Think I’m exaggerating? Check out just a few of the tweets from during her presentation:





Everyone has their own style, and I certainly learned a lot from the presentation and wasn’t bored. But. I’m not a fan of nonfiction presentations (aka not horror plays or movies) inciting fear and panic in the audience. I think it’s counter-productive when talking to a room full of intelligent, educated individuals. Librarians aren’t 5 year olds who need to be told about icky germs in order to get us to wash our hands. I’m sure there could have been a way to give this presentation with truths and realities that could be frightening without actually inciting this level of anxiety. Even just a little positivity and more hope for the future would have been nice. You don’t want a populace that is exerting all their energy preparing for Armageddon.
I should also mention that I stood up to ask a question of Garrett at the end. With all the talk of synthetic biology, I wanted to know what her opinion was on GMOs. I admit, this is not an issue I am yet clear-cut on myself. I generally prefer organic, but I also understand the value of say rice that has been modified to have more vitamins in it for an at-risk population. But on the other hand I get the concern of manipulating something at a genetic level and what that might do to our own bodies when we ingest it. It’s something that just doesn’t have enough long-term studies yet to really show if it’s truly safe or not, and it concerns me that it’s mostly the poor, at-risk populations who are being used as guinea pigs eating it.
In any case, I asked Garrett at the public microphone about her stance on GMO foods and the movement to label them. Given all of her doom and gloom talk about synthetic viruses, I was shocked at her answer. She believes that GMO foods are necessary because as more of the world becomes middle class, more of the world is eating meat, and meat eating just cannot be sustained on the land we currently have available, so we must turn to eating synthetic foods.
Um, EXCUSE ME?!?!
So the lady who just spent over an hour and a half talking about how dangerous synthetic biology could turn out to be turns right around and says that meat eating isn’t sustainable to feed the entire globe (which it isn’t, see this article in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition) turns right around and says that well we have to eat GMOs to feed everyone because people won’t just give up meat. Right, ok, if someone is so concerned about the possible bad consequences of synthetic biology don’t you think she might possibly take this opportunity to espouse a vegetarian, vegan, or even just more plant-based diet to combat the global food crisis instead of relying exclusively on GMOs? Apparently not. Apparently it’s really great to fear-monger about pandemics and international relations but when it comes to what we eat, the basis of much of our health, that’s too controversial.
Well, at least it was an interesting final couple of hours of MLA13, although I can’t say I really feel that it was very useful to librarians or working to promote true global health.
Boston Marathon Bombings
Hello all. I just wanted to take a moment to let those of you who don’t follow me on twitter or facebook know that I and my loved ones are safe, although a student who goes to the university I am an academic librarian at is one of the (currently) three dead. My medical library serves the medical school that is affiliated with one of the Boston hospitals caring for the victims, and we also serve as the medical library for that hospital. Today is my first day back at work after my long weekend (which was pre-scheduled for Marathon Monday). Things are very subdued on-campus. My morning commute had a side of national guardsmen and extra police presence as I commute directly through part of the area that was put on lock-down after the bombings.
I am full of mixed emotions. I am incredibly grateful that myself and my loved ones are safe, but I am also full of empathy for everyone who cannot say that. I am angry that someone would attack a bunch of innocent people on a day that is about so many positive things. The Boston Marathon is about athleticism, cheering on the accomplishments of others, and fortitude. But it also takes place on Patriot’s Day. Patriot’s Day is celebrated in Massachusetts, Maine, and Wisconsin to commemorate the first battle of the American Revolutionary War. It celebrates our freedom, and in Boston, it’s about celebrating being the birthplace of our nation. And I hope that the people of Boston won’t let the events of Monday ruin our celebrations in the years to come. You defeat terrorism by refusing to be terrorized. My boyfriend and I have already made a pact that next year we are going to the marathon and we are cheering our guts out. In the meantime, I am just continuing to live my life and trying to do whatever small part I can to support those who have much tougher rows to hoe.
If your heart has been touched by what has occurred in my city, I ask you not to pray, but to do something. If you can afford it, donate to the official One Fund set up by Governor Patrick and Mayor Menino. It is a verified safe way to get the funds where they will reach those in need. If you can’t afford to donate money and are close by, donate blood. Or donate blood where you are in honor of the event. If you can’t do either of those things, or even if you do those things, then please show support in other ways. Express support online, offer a shoulder to cry on or an ear to listen. Try not to let anyone fall through the cracks. Let those around you know that somebody cares.
Friday Fun! (Where the Hell Has This Weekly Meme Been Anyway?)
Hello my lovely readers!
So, I knew I hadn’t written a Friday Fun post in a while, but was floored to see it hadn’t happened since November 16, 2012.
o_O
I know we all hate it when bloggers talk about their crazy busy lives, even though it’s true, because, hello, we all have busy lives! Suffice to say, what I thought was a busy phase is actually the new stasis of my life. I’m proud of the fact that I’m still managing to find time to blog, because I do love book blogging. But I want to continue to touch base with you all periodically. Weekly is just too overwhelming though. So I’ve decided to move Friday Fun to just occurring on the last Friday (or Saturday) of every month. Treating it more like a special event instead of a weekly meme will help me keep up and enjoy it. I hope you all enjoy the new change!
On a similar note, I am still closed to review requests, and I don’t expect that to be changing anytime soon. I still periodically request ARCs, if I’m highly interested, but that is a rare occurrence. I also, you may have noticed, switched my reading from about 50% things I felt I “should” be reading (for ARCs, to better myself, etc….) down to about 10%. This means 90% of my reading is for funsies, because frankly I need that stress relief in my life. Reading “should’s” worked great when I was in a life limbo and needing to fill the time with actual things to do that made me feel like I was accomplishing something. But now when I read, I want it to be for fun. I need it to be a stress reliever. Something that helps give me a few moments of internally-focused peace in my day. So any changes you’ve noticed in the books being reviewed here reflect that choice I made at the beginning of 2013.
As for my non-blog life! The holidays happened. I taught my first library orientation by myself for the incoming class of one of the schools affiliated with my library. I created my first library tutorials. I finished my first archival finding aid. Those have been the big-hitters in work life. In regular, non-librarian Amanda life I went on vacation with my boyfriend to an off-the-grid cabin! We snowshoed and built fires in wood stoves and generally thoroughly enjoyed ourselves. I went home to visit my dad in Vermont and learned how to make the perfect grilled cheese. I got an iPhone. I became addicted to Instagram and taking photos in general. I survived Blizzard Nemo and got my first real snowday in *years*. I learned how to play the Call of Cthulhu tabletop game. Finally, I just last week joined my gym’s 60 day fitness competition, and I am loving how much it has reinvigorated my passion for fitness. And I’m still trying to figure out how to be a part-time indie author in amongst all of this.
How was everyone’s March? Ours came in like a lion and out like a lamb, just like the old saying goes.
Friday Fun! (Camping and Where I Have Been!)
Hello my lovely readers!
Yes, I realize it’s technically Saturday, but things have been rather quiet around here the last couple of weeks, and I didn’t want to leave you hanging any longer! So why have things been so quiet?
Well, first, it was Labor Day weekend here in the States, and I actually for once went on vacation for it. Shocking, I know. I went camping in the Green Mountains. This was the view from my tent:
Gorgeous, eh? And it was such a great break! Zero technology. My cell phone didn’t even have reception. I got disgustingly filthy, and I loved it. I went for a swim in the pond and for a hike and cooked over a campfire.
Oh, yes, and the boy I’ve been dating asked me to be his girlfriend, and I said yes.
He’s an awesome boyfriend, and I love him.
Beyond the vacation and personal development, it’s the start of the semester at work, so I’ve been incredibly busy with beginning of the semester library classes, orientations, and just general helping out the new students. Also, the audiobook I’m currently reading while completely *awesome* (Fuzzy Nation by John Scalzi), is also super-long. The other book I was reading on my kindle that will be reviewed next week was kind of dullsville, so had trouble holding my interest. All of these things came together to make for a bit of silence, BUT! Never fear. I will always return! With bells on.
Happy weekends all!
Book Review: Claws and Saucers by David Ellroy Goldweber
Summary:
An alphabetical guide to scifi, horror, and fantasy movies made between 1902 and 1982.
Review:
One thing I have learned from the two movie reference guides I’ve received for review since starting this book blog is that movie reference guides are not for me. Frankly with things like, oh, the internet, they’re just not useful the way they were back when I was in undergrad and professors wouldn’t accept IMDB as a reference in your English paper comparing books to their movie versions. But I digress.
Putting on my librarian cap then why does this reference guide get 2 and not 3 stars? (3 indicating not for me but maybe for others). It frankly bothers me how not academic it is. It essentially reads as a list randomly assembled by some random dude down the road, not a professor of the history of film or a film critic or anything like that really. This would be great for a blog, but not for a serious reference book. Additionally, maybe the print edition is better, but the ebook version is badly formatted and contains none of the pictures promised in the blurb.
The book basically then is your neighbor yammering in alphabetical order about random movies he selected from the early 1900s with all of the natural individual prejudices and caveats that go along with that. There’s nothing academic about it, and when push comes to shove, it’s something that would be better off as a blog than a book. I will give it this though: the title and cover are excellent.
2 out of 5 stars
Source: Netgalley
Research Data Management Services (Social Sciences Librarian Boot Camp 2012)
After the GIS hands-on session, I attended one final session presented by Katherine McNeill, Social Sciences Data Service and Economics Librarian at MIT. This was a great session and included a discussion portion for sharing of ideas and challenges with colleagues.
- There is a tradition of being able to replicate scientific results.
- The NSF and NIH have data sharing requirements.
- MIT librarians saw an opportunity to support faculty as data producers not just data consumers.
- They now have a research data management team that provide: a workshop, website, data storage, and consultations.
- The individual consultations consist of: initial meetings; advice on documentation, intellectual property, confidentiality, data conversion and file format issues; and facilitate deposit of data in archive or repository
- Recommends “Conducting a Data Interview” by Witt and Carlson
- Don’t be afraid to reach out to faculty.
- It can be difficult for specialists to figure out how to make data accessible to undergrads or the everyman.
- Issues to Consider
- What is your organizational culture?
- Assess the needs of your researchers.
- Relationship to other departments in the university.
- Relationship between data specialists and subject librarians.
- Do the issues span disciplines or are they discipline specific?
- Facilitating compliance without coming across as police.
- Educate users to expect this service.
- Determine level of service to be provided.
- Learning from other institutions.
- Recommended resources: IASSIST, Digital Curation Centre, ICPSR, ARL Resources for Data Management Planning
- In conclusion, build on your expertise. Be pioneering, thoughtful, proactive. Let what faculty need be your guide. Reach out to your colleagues.
Faculty Panel on Research Methods (Social Sciences Librarian Boot Camp 2012)
“Anthropological Methods” Dr. Sarah Pinto, Tufts University
- anthropology–study of human behavior in its cultural context
- What do you want to learn?
- How do you want to learn it?
- People are complicated. Worlds are complex.
- Zora Neale Hurston was not just a writer, she was also an anthropologist.
- Franz Boaz was the father of anthropology.
- Anthropology can be done at home.
- It requires constant reflection on oneself.
- Work with people. Don’t enact on them.
- It is not objective in search of fact but interpretive in search of meaning.
- There are four principles of anthropological fieldwork.
- #1 participant observation–to learn about what’s going on in people’s lives, you have to spend a lot of time with them.
- #2 interviewing/conversation
- #3 fieldnotes–there is tons of interesting writing on anthropological notetaking
- #4 reflexivity–perspective, co-authorship, politics of the encounter
- Recommends Tristes Tropiques
by Claude Levi-Strauss (memoir, originally in French, translated into English)
- Recommends In the Realm of the Diamond Queen: Marginality in Out-of-the Way Place
by Anna Tsing
- Data is inherently messy but when you put it together it gives us the richness we were looking for.
“Exploring Social Psychology” Dr. Keith Maddox, Tufts University
- social psychology–scientific study of how individuals think, feel, and behave in a social context
- We tend to want to conform to the norms others have set.
- We’re different people when we’re with other people than when we’re by ourselves.
- What makes social psychology scientific is all in the method.
- Three guiding principles of social psychology
- #1 reality is a social construction–we perceive our ideas of others more than how they are in fact
- #2 determinants of behavior–person(ality) x situation = behavior
- #3 the power of the situation–personality is often overemphasized. We fail to take into account the situation the person is in.
- Tools of the trade include: questionnaires, rating scales, statements, movements, body language, self or observer reported
- Tricks of the trade (overcoming challenges). When people know they’re being studied, they might alter their behavior. How to combat this? Use deception, for instance, mislead people in the instructions to think we’re studying one thing when really we are studying another. Use of confederates. Field experiments.
- Social Psychologists must balance a number of concerns. Scientific rigor, setting that is psychologically valid, and ethics.
Body Language and Elections (Social Sciences Librarian Boot Camp 2012)
“Analyzing Participation of Voters in US Presidential Elections” Dr. Charles Stewart III, MIT
- Recommends the book Southern Politics in State and Nation
- Have elections gotten better since 2000?
- Ideological claims amount to religious beliefs, not scientific beliefs.
- Based on 2000 data between 1.5 and 2 million votes were lost to voting machines, 2 million to registration difficulties, and 1 million to voters getting frustrated on site and walking away.
- All voting data for each state is online except for Massachusetts.
- EAC–Election Assistance Commission
- There has been real improvements in voting machines.
- Recommends DataFerret (although, the website appears to be busted?)
- We’re doing better at registering and counting votes, but do we feel better? Although we’ve improved, Americans don’t believe it.
- Recommends The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It
“Body Language” Dr. Joseph Tecce, Boston College
- Extremes in body language and/or eye movement are red flags.
- Negative feeling states always increase blink rate.
- Positive feeling states always decrease blink rate.
- Indicators of stress include: eye blinks, gaze aversion.
- During the 2008 presidential debates, Obama blinked 62 times, and McCain blinked 104 times (per minute?)
- Although we have no video of as high stress of a situation as a presidential debate of Romney, the current video of him on a panel shows a 16 blink rate.
- Tecce predicts that Romeny and Obama are going to have a very close election.
- Blink rate of televised presidential candidates during their debates predict 100% who will win, except in 2000.
- Thus, we know that blink rate predicts the popular vote.
- Social cue hypothesis: body language is not just a social cue, it’s an indicator.
- You cant tell when someone is lying from one indicator, but it’s a good sign to be on alert.
“Forecasting Elections” Munish Puri, Recorded Future
- Perspective is affected by the four p’s: perch, point of view, period, permanence.
- When talking or writing about forecasting, it’s important to consider the point of view of the predictor.
- political risk–how politics impact business
- Make and falsify predictions by using: probability, impact, and time range.
- Recommended tools to monitor and watch elections: Electionista, WaPo Modifiable Model, GooglePortal, Yahoo Clues
- Insight big data can show us: signal, shift, blindspot, outlier, and flashpoints
- Recommends Evernote and MindManager









